Re: pl/pgsql and Transaction Isolation
От | Marcus Whitney |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pl/pgsql and Transaction Isolation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200406080919.45031.marcus@coldfeetcreative.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pl/pgsql and Transaction Isolation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
You were right not to believe it. I had an update on a whole table that I hadn't noticed. Thanks for debunking. On Monday 07 June 2004 23:29, you wrote: > Marcus Whitney <marcus@coldfeetcreative.com> writes: > > I have an instance where I have a series of pl/pgsql calls, that report > > stat results to a common table. When other queries try to hit the stat > > table (with DML commands; SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE etc.) they are > > forced to wait in a queue until the pl/pgsql has finished executing. > > This is quite hard to believe, unless your pl/pgsql is doing something > as unfriendly as LOCKing the table. > > Do you want to post a more complete description of your problem? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org -- marcus whitney
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: