Re: pg_dump --comment?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dump --comment? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200405311337.i4VDbam12872@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dump --comment? (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote: > This can be accomplished with 10-20 lines of shell scripting. I don't > think it's worth the trouble bloating pg_dump with it at all. Considering how much bloat -v adds, adding a datestamp to it is trivial.-v outputs things like:---- TOC entry 1449 (class0 OID 0)-- Dependencies: 4-- Name: public; Type: ACL; Schema: -; Owner: postgres-- so adding a timestamp at the top is probably a good extension. Actually, the pg_dump -v docs are incorrect because they only mention additional stderr output, not the additional comments. I updated the text to: Specifies verbose mode. This will cause <application>pg_dump</application> to output detailed object comments in the dump file, and progress messages to standard error. This -v functionality controlling comments is new in 7.5. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: