Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040529.002739.85412964.t-ishii@sra.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>) |
Ответы |
Re: Nested xacts: looking for testers and review
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Can I ask you one more question? Is there any limit for nesting leveles of subtransactions? -- Tatsuo Ishii > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 04:51:07PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > > 2) certain behavior was different from what I expected (please correct me > > if my expectation is wrong). > > Yes, the expected behavior is different: if an aborted subtransaction is > closed with a COMMIT or END command, the parent transaction is aborted > too. This is to inhibit an application which blindly expects the > subtransaction to succeed to reach an invalid state. If you want to > return to non-aborted state, end the subtransaction with ROLLBACK > instead. > > But Bob Henkel and you are right: there needo to be documentation. > Initially I figured I could do that later because there is no new > syntax, but it is obviously needed to explain all sorts of assumptions > and behavior like this. > > -- > Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) > "Limítate a mirar... y algun día veras" > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: