Re:

On Sun, 23 May 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
> > There will always be people who won't read the notes, or ignore the
> > notes,
>
> Does anyone want to contemplate hacking things so that the Windows port
> reports a different version number?  "0.1" might give people the right
> sort of impression about what we think of that port's stability ...

How about a pop-up when starting up that repeatedly reinforces that this
is considered a early port, and should be treated as such in a production
environment.  When we have it to the point we consider stable, we remove
teh popup?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664