Re: Email data type
От | Steve Atkins |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Email data type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040517162220.GA3552@gp.word-to-the-wise.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Email data type ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Email data type
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 05:01:05PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: > > a@foo.bar is syntactically valid. a@foo.invalid is > > syntactically valid, but should be immediately rejected. > > I disagree - just because the database server cannot verify the the > existence of a domain does not mean that it isn't valid. I think only > addresses that are syntactically incorrect should be rejected. I think you're missing the point. Go and take a glance at RFC 2606 - it's a BCP which defines the .test, .invalid, .example and .localhost TLDs. Of course, some users may want to use .invalid email addresses in their database, despite their being, by definition, invalid. It's something that will vary depending on their needs. Cheers, Steve
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: