Re: threads stuff/UnixWare

On Wed, 12 May 2004, Larry Rosenman wrote:

> I'd LIKE to be able to have PG wrappers for those functions, and have
> the first invocation of them look via dlsym() for the real ones, and if
> they are NOT there, use fake functions that assume we are NOT threaded.

Wouldn't it be easier to have a #define?

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but the problem is that we are expecting
thread functinos to be called x_, while Unixware defines them as pthread_,
right? so make Unixware specific #defines that map x_ to pthread_ ...



----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664