Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200405061637.i46Gbfe05942@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup (sdv mailer <sdvmailer@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
sdv mailer wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > Sorry for the confusion because Rod asked a question > and I answered too quickly. This is what I mean. > > 15x Slower: > ----------- > Client <--TCP--> PgPool <--UNIX--> PostgreSQL > Client <--TCP--> PgPool <--TCP--> PostgreSQL > > 5x Faster: > ---------- > Client <--UNIX--> PgPool <--UNIX--> PostgreSQL > Client <--UNIX--> PgPool <--TCP--> PostgreSQL > > > Hope this helps! Pgpool speeds up connection time by > 5x with UNIX socket due to pre-fork and connection > pooling. However, pgpool slows down by 15x under TCP > socket for some unknown reason. How does this compare to using tcpip without pgpool? Is it the tcp startup/shutdown time that is hurting performance? pgpool is using persistent connections so I don't think a difference would show up there, but the client/pgpool connections are being created/destroyed frequently. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: