Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200405060249.i462nj810260@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? (Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Manfred Koizar wrote: > With subtransactions we'd have to fall back to checking pg_clog (and > pg_subtrans) in certain cases. There are lots of possible > implementations. Here are some ideas (just brainstorming): > > . We could first scan the PGPROC array. If the xid is an active main > transaction, we're finished. > > . If xid is older than RecentGlobalXmin, it cannot be active. > > . We could include a small number of subtransaction xids in PGPROC. > > . For additional subtransactions not fitting into this small array > there could be minsubxid and maxsubxid fields in PGPROC. If the xid we > are looking for is outside all these ranges, it cannot be an active > subtransaction. > > . If all these tests fail, we fall back to checking pg_clog. Could we add a boolean to each PROC structure indicating if that xid has subtransactions? If none have subtransactions, we don't need to look in pg_clog. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: