Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> >>Now, I have to change that relation_expr to qualified_name.  However, 
> >>this causes shift/reduce errors. (Due to ALTER TABLE relation_expr SET 
> >>WITHOUT OIDS.)
> > 
> > Well, seems like what you have to do is leave it as relation_expr
> > as far as bison is concerned, but test in the C-code action and error
> > out if "*" was specified.  (Accepting ONLY seems alright to me.)
> 
> Actually, it occurs to me that the SET WITHOUT CLUSTER form CAN recurse. 
>    Should I make it do that, even though the CLUSTER ON form cannot?

I just thought about this.  CLUSTER is more of a storage-level
specification, rather than a logical one.  Seems it is OK that WITOUTH
CLUSTER not recurse into inherited tables, especially since the CLUSTER
command does not.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073