Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040429164815.V45839@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Merlin Moncure wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Yes, it was vague. The question is now that we are a month away, do > > we > > > want to target June 1, mid-June, or July 1. > > > > If I may humbly chime in here...there currently is no binary packing for > > the win32 port. Magnus is currently working on an installer/service > > manager (dubbed 'longer term' on the status page) that would be nice to > > see make it in before the feature freeze. Based on the current rate of > > development, finishing this and various other sundry issues (even > > allowing for corrections within the beta period) within a month involves > > a fair degree of optimism. In short, speaking strictly from a win32 > > perspective, a June 1 date will probably be missed. > > Well, if Win32 doesn't complete by June 1, do we still do the feature > freeze? I don't want to be adding features after the freeze, that is > for sure. When we have done that in the past, it has caused problems > because some stuff gets in to make the system unstable, but other stuff > gets left out. That is something that should be discussed a couple of days before June 1st, when we have a clearer idea of just how far off Win32 will be ... right now, if Win32 is *that* far off the June 1st mark, I'd say definitely to a feature freeze, as much as I'd like to see the Win32 features in ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: