Re: Do we prefer software that works or software that looks good?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we prefer software that works or software that looks good? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200404261016.07903.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Do we prefer software that works or software that looks good? (Shachar Shemesh <psql@shemesh.biz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we prefer software that works or software
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Shachar, > Now, I'm intending to do the best I can on my end. This does have a > pretty heavy cost. It means that the OLE DB driver will parse in details > each query, and perform replacements on the query text. This is bug > prone, difficult, hurts performance, and just plain wrong from a > software design perspective. The current drift of wind, however, means > that the PostgreSQL steering commite seems to prefer having a lesser > quality driver to seeing ugly uppercase. Hey, now wait a minute. As far as I can tell, you've heard only from Tom Lane on the steering committee (I may have missed some, though, I've been sick) Unless the 5 of us take a vote, Tom Lane speaks for Tom Lane, not for Core. Also, usually this list or Patches determines by consensus what gets in; the Core only gets involved in very unusual cases. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: