Re: License question
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: License question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200404221856.46322.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: License question (Shachar Shemesh <psql@shemesh.biz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Can anyone shed more light on this point for me? Am I misreading > something? If it is possible to put code into an LGPL project, what > is the requirement? You have to display the PostgreSQL license text in the source code or the binary, depending on what you ship. A strict interpretation would say that considering the combined work, this is an additional requirement on top of the [L]GPL, so it is not allowed by the terms of the [L]GPL. (But it is allowed by the terms of the PostgreSQL license.) A looser interpretation would say that what the PostgreSQL license text says is essentially a subset of what the [L]GPL already says anyway, so adding the requirements of the PostgreSQL license on top of it does not actually impose additional requirements, so there is no problem. Which one of these interpretations you believe is between you and the copyright holders of that LGPL'ed work, but the PostgreSQL copyright holders don't care.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: