Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040422030811.GB6727@dcc.uchile.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:47:11PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Joe Conway wrote: > > - dblink-type capability should someday make it into the backend, albeit > > in the form of something compliant to the SQL/MED spec. This is > > standard functionality in many of the RDBMSs that Postgres users > > migrate from, and it is needed by enterprise users. > > dblink isn't an integrated replication solution, it is a standalone one > ... to date, I have not seen one replication solution that solves all the > issues, and unless someone comes up with the be all, end all replication > solution, none of them should be considered 'part of the backend' ... You are thinking of dbmirror, while Joe talks about dblink. It's orthogonal functionality ... -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) "Cuando miro a alguien, más me atrae cómo cambia que quién es" (J. Binoche)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: