Re: PostgreSQL configuration
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL configuration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200404121455.i3CEtdT17825@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL configuration ("Thomas Swan" <tswan@idigx.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL configuration
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Swan wrote: > I thought the idea was to *reduce* the number of config files and provide > a unified configuration file. Ideally, the unified configuration file > could eliminate the need for environment variables altogether. > > If I understand this correctly, the author was adding the ability to do > this, not remove the default behavior. > > A single configuration point (which can be changed with a commandline > switch) with the ability to include would be an exceptionally versatile > asset for postgresql. Maybe relocating PID would be a bad idea and > someone could clobber their database, but that could be addressed with > LARGE WARNING in that config file where the option is available. > > Outside of the unified config file argument. "Configuration includes" > give postgresql the ability to have shared settings. You could have a > shared pg_hba.conf and test all other manner of settings with a set of > config files (sort_mem, shared_buffers, etc.) that say include a > standard_pg_hba.conf to control access. I suggested a new pg_path configuration file because it would enable centralized config only if it was used. By adding /data location to postgresql.conf, you have the postgresql.conf file acting sometimes via PGDATA and sometimes as a central config file, and I thought that was confusing. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: