[OT] Porting from Oracle [was Connection Idle in transaction]
От | Tim Pizey |
---|---|
Тема | [OT] Porting from Oracle [was Connection Idle in transaction] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200404090858.47539.timp@paneris.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Connection Idle in transaction ("David Wall" <d.wall@computer.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [OT] Porting from Oracle [was Connection Idle in transaction]
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Friday 09 April 2004 3:23 am, David Wall wrote: > Wow, thanks. Yeah, I agree about priorities. The problem doesn't bother > me at all since we've not seen any issues with PG and it's worked like a > champ for several years in multiple deployments, including being used in > Fortune 500 deployments, by our office edition licensees of Signed & > Secured, and to drive our public web service at yozons.com. It's just been > awesome, fast and reliable. In fact, when we had to port Oracle, we had to > "dumb down" our application a bit because of their odd handling of BLOBs, > inability to support multiple TEXT (LONG) fields in a single table and > their shorter table and field names. I am rather keen to develop a service porting people toPG from Oracle. I have always got the impression that this was a non-no due to the PL side of Oracl PL/SQL? What can Oracle do that PG can't ? cheers timp
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: