Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200404082145.i38LjEm22007@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | using index on comparison with bit-operation? (geek_1981@yahoo.de (Michael Groth)) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Groth wrote: > hi, > > is it possible to use an index on the expression '(table_1.field & > table_2.field)::int > 0' ? > > here's the whole query: > > SELECT > COUNT(*) > FROM > users AS users > JOIN > search_profile AS search_profile ON > (search_profile.bin_matching_field_0 & > users.bin_matching_field_0)::int > 0 > WHERE > users.id = 190 No, there is no way to use an index because the columns are in different tables. It is like saying: tab1.col1 = tab2.col2 Now, you want them both to be true, so it is really: tab1.col1 AND tab2.col2 and that can be indexed by separate indexes on col1 and col2. Of course, if many rows are true, the index will not be used because it is faster to just look at all the rows with a sequential scan. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: