Re: good pc but bad performance,why?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: good pc but bad performance,why? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200404080133.i381XYu13325@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: good pc but bad performance,why? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: good pc but bad performance,why?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > scott.marlowe wrote: > >>> There is no real need (or benefit) from having the database on a > >>> journalled filesystem - the journalling is only trying to give similar > >>> sorts of guarantees to what the fsync in PostgreSQL is doing. > >> > >> Is this true? I was under the impression that without at least meta-data > >> journaling postgresql could still be corrupted by power failure. > > > It is false. ext2 isn't crash-safe, and PostgreSQL needs an intact file > > system for WAL recovery. > > But it should be okay to set the filesystem to journal only its own > metadata. There's no need for it to journal file contents. Can you set ext2 to journal metadata? I didn't know it could do that. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: