Re: Documentation clairification?, CHECK constraints
От | Karl O. Pinc |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Documentation clairification?, CHECK constraints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040331122747.I1749@mofo.meme.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Documentation clairification?, CHECK constraints (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Documentation clairification?, CHECK constraints
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 2004.03.31 10:53 Tom Lane wrote: > "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com> writes: > > But SQL has 3 valued logic (strictly speaking, not boolean). It > > seems that the CHECK clases fail only when the expression result > > is FALSE, and pass when the result is either TRUE or UNKNOWN. > > Correct --- this is per spec. > > > Yes? Should this be clarified in the documentation? > > Sure, send a documentation patch. --- create_table.sgml Wed Mar 31 12:57:02 2004 +++ create_table.sgml.new Wed Mar 31 13:16:55 2004 @@ -383,11 +383,14 @@ <para> The <literal>CHECK</> clause specifies an expression producing a Boolean result which new or updated rows must satisfy for an - insert or update operation to succeed. A check constraint - specified as a column constraint should reference that column's - value only, while an expression appearing in a table constraint - may reference multiple columns. + insert or update operation to succeed. Expressions evaluating + to TRUE or UNKNOWN succeed. Should any row of an insert or + update operation produce a FALSE result an error exception is + raised and the insert or update does not alter the database. A + check constraint specified as a column constraint should + reference that column's value only, while an expression + appearing in a table constraint may reference multiple columns. </para> <para> Karl <kop@meme.com> Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward." -- Robert A. Heinlein
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: