Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200403301828.59498.dev@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 17:43, Josh Berkus wrote: > Jaime, Richard, > > > That's going to depend on a number of things: > > There are some test results people have provided in the archives, but > > whether they apply to your setup is open to argument. > > True. On Linux overall, XFS, JFS, and Reiser have all looked good at one > time or another. Ext3 has never been a leader for performance, though, so > that's an easy elimination. True, but on the sorts of commodity boxes I use, it doesn't make sense for me to waste time setting up non-standard filesystems - it's cheaper to spend a little more for better performance. I think SuSE offer Reiser though, so maybe we'll see a wider selection available by default. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: