Re: PG vs MySQL
От | Mike Nolan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PG vs MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200403292132.i2TLWUMX017652@gw.tssi.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PG vs MySQL ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> since the purpose of the pg_hba.conf file is to ensure that you never > manage to lock yourself out of your database, might it make sense to have > a pg_hba table in each database that can be / will be / should be(???) > overidden by the pg_hba.conf file, thus ensuring you never get locked out, > but allowing the vast majority of connection configuration to be handled > by tables, with the pg_hba.conf as an emergency procedure used to get the > warp engines online in case some drunken ensign starts singing "I'll take > you home Kathleen" and shuts them down. (i.e. "delete from pg_hba" or > something like it.)??? How about some kind of 'include table pg_hba' statement in the pg_hba.conf file? Anything prior to that could not be overridden by entries in the pg_hba table, and the absence of an include statement means that only the file entries are used, preserving the current behavior. -- Mike Nolan
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: