Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040323220338.GA14682@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux (matt@ymogen.net) |
Ответы |
Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 08:53:42PM -0000, matt@ymogen.net wrote: > is way down the priority list compared with IO throughput, stability, > manageability, support, etc etc. Indeed, if our Suns actually diabled the broken hardware when they died, fell over, and rebooted themselves, I'd certainly praise them to heaven. But I have to say that the really very good reporting of failing memory has saved me some headaches. > environment, I'd take the Sun every day of the week, assuming that those > compile option changes have sorted out the oddly slow PG performance at > last. I seem to have hit a bad batch of Dell hardware recently, which makes me second this opinion. I should say, also, that my initial experience of AIX has been extremely good. I can't comment on the fun it might involve in the long haul, of course. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary and imaginative work need not end up well. --Dennis Ritchie
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: