Why O_SYNC is faster than fsync on ext3
От | Yusuf Goolamabbas |
---|---|
Тема | Why O_SYNC is faster than fsync on ext3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040321043736.GA21803@outblaze.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Why O_SYNC is faster than fsync on ext3
Re: Why O_SYNC is faster than fsync on ext3 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I sent this to Bruce but forgot to cc pgsql-hackers, The patches are likely to go into 2.6.6. People interested in extremely safe fsync writes should also follow the IDE barrier thread and the true fsync() in Linux on IDE thread ----- Forwarded message from Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg@outblaze.com> ----- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 20:52:34 +0800 From: Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg@outblaze.com> To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> Subject: Your fsync thread on hackers Message-ID: <20040320125234.GA11221@outblaze.com> Bruce, haven't followed the thread completely. Accessing the web archive is slow from Hong Kong but I just wanted to point you to this lkml post which shows why O_SYNC is much faster than fsync (at least on ext3) http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107959907410443&w=2 There are some pending fsync speedups on XFS also. You might want to consider pointing Tom to do this so he can get the Redhat/Fedora guys to look at the patches Hope this helps, Regards, Yusuf ----- End forwarded message ----- -- If you're not using Firefox, you're not surfing the web you're suffering it http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/why/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: