Re: pgsql-server/src/backend/utils/sort tuplesort.c
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend/utils/sort tuplesort.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200403180306.i2I36Ig01265@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend/utils/sort tuplesort.c (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-committers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> During btree index build, sort equal-keyed tuples according to their > >> TID (heap position). This doesn't do anything to the validity of the > >> finished index, but by pretending to qsort() that there are no really > >> equal keys in the sort, we can avoid performance problems with qsort > >> implementations that have trouble with large numbers of equal keys. > >> Patch from Manfred Koizar. > > > I think there is also the advantage that many equal keys will access the > > heap in a more sequential, rather than random, order, which is the part > > that really excited me. > > But we aren't attempting to maintain that ordering after index build. > (In fact, it was exactly that point that triggered the argument last > time round ...) Agreed, but we don't maintain CLUSTER either. I see no harm in having it start out ordered, at least. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: