Re: Log rotation
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Log rotation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200403141850.i2EIo5J01407@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Log rotation (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Log rotation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com> writes: > > Lamar Owen wrote: > >> Third, it seems that you don't have enough profiling data to support > >> a 'syslog is bad' position. > > > That is true. It is from hearsay, from people who run production > > environments. It may be a belief based on old experiences though. > > I think it's pretty well established that syslog sucks for high log > volume if you run it in the mode where it fsyncs its log after every > message. But I don't believe we have any data that says it's a problem > even if you avoid that pitfall. What versions of syslog fsync, and where is the syslog.conf option. I don't see it on FreeBSD or Linux. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: