Re: Log rotation
От | Bruno Wolff III |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Log rotation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040312202940.GA9345@wolff.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Log rotation (Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Log rotation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 15:19:29 -0500, Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com> wrote: > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > >I can see their problem with making a dependency to all of apache or > >including > >multilog in their distribution. But they probably could include something > >that is only a logger either using some project that is only a logger or > >splitting out the logger that is bundled with apache. Then it wouldn't > >be unreasonable to make a dependency for postgres requiring that logging > >rpm. Other services could also make use of this logging package as well. > > > > Yes that would be nice. I have no idea how difficult it would be to > extricate the logrotate program from Apache. I also don't know if there > would be any license restrictions, would we be able to redistribute it as > an independently package? I don't know the answer. I was suggesting this as something a distro maintainer (such as Redhat) could do. I think that the postgres developers shouldn't be spending time doing this. They should be just suggesting some possibilities in the admin part of the documentation.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: