Re: Default Stats Revisited
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Default Stats Revisited |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200403111755.31689.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Default Stats Revisited (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Default Stats Revisited
Re: Default Stats Revisited |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 11 March 2004 14:17, Josh Berkus wrote: > Tom, > > > Maybe you should ask on -admin or -general. Personally I thought there > > wasn't anything to say until someone did some experiments to show > > whether an indexed-column differential is really worthwhile and what a > > plausible default value would be. The idea sounds good in the abstract, > > but will it really help or just be another useless setting? > > Yeah, that's our next step, a test. > > On Monday, I hope to have comparative stats for a difficult database on > the 3 solutions (leaving things as-is, raising the general default stats, > and doing index_stats). Do you plan on handeling primary key columns differently (since they are likely to be unique and indexed) ? Also how will you handle column that are part of expressional indexes (where foo is true for example) ? Final thought... I'm a DBA and I think the straight number is simpler, though could be convinced to go with whichever is higher... Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: