Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200403101101.13262.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Tuesday 09 March 2004 16:53, Josh Berkus wrote: > Robert, > > > Are you planning on running this along with the current website projects > > (www/techdocs/etc...) or will this be independent? > > Independent. Gforge is 90% dynamic content, and as such it won't fit in > with the mirroring scheme for Portal. > even if doesnt fit into the mirroring scheme that doesnt mean it has to be seperate.... techdocs/advocacy arnt mirrored... just wondering if discussion on its development would take place here so everyone is in the loop... that type of thing... > ie. There was > > > previous discussion of a projects.postgresql.net domain to be used for > > this, is that deprecated? > > The guys (Andrew, Marc, etc.) liked www.pgfoundry.org more. Several other > addresses will be configured to point to this one. > hmm...from an advocacy point istm this would be a good place to play up the postgresql brand, such that it is... but ce la vei i guess > >Also for theming, shouldn't it use the main > > postgresql.org css ? > > Can't AFAIK, GForge is not xhtml/css-based. Gforge formatting is > database-centric. It uses css for sure... just a question of where its going to pull it from... if they want to be seperate though i guess a different look/feel would be the way to go. (It's just counter to what people have complained about in the past with gborg...) Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: