Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200403100843.44126.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Dave, > Even for the mailing lists and all the subscribers? Even so. Both GBorg and GForge use mailman, which makes moving stuff over a snap. The projects who will have difficultly are those who use pgsql-xxx@postgresql.org mailing lists off the main Majordomo server (such as ODBC), but then they had the same problem under GBorg. >I assume also that > users will have to coordinate with their projects to sort out fresh CVS > checkouts at an appropriate time? Nope. CVS should also be automatic. Advantage of our virtual machines .... Right, Marc? > If you're interested we can probably move the pgAdmin projects (there > are 3) as test ones. Pgadmin has mailing list, faqs, screenshots, > downloads, cvs and some lists but is basically shut down now and there > purely for archive/reference purposes. Pgadmin2 and pgadmin3 are just > placeholders with links to their websites only. All other options have > been removed. Then they wouldn't be much of a test, would they? <grin> Libpqxx has already volunteered to be the "test bunny". Also we have a couple of new projects pending which will given us a test run. > If it's to be re-themed and integrated, perhaps it would be prudent to > wait until the next stage of the portal project which will involve > looking at it's design? That is the primary site that should look right, > and as we've discussed a number of times in the past, one thing we need > is a common look and feel across all the sites. Sounds good to me. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: