Re: Database Encryption (now required by law in Italy)
От | Silvana Di Martino |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Database Encryption (now required by law in Italy) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200403081226.10550.silvanadimartino@tin.it обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Database Encryption (now required by law in Italy) ("Peter Galbavy" <peter.galbavy@knowtion.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Database Encryption (now required by law in Italy)
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Alle 09:32, lunedì 8 marzo 2004, Peter Galbavy ha scritto: > Perhaps, given the potential commercial necessities of this for larger > organisations, find out what Oracle and IBM propose doing or have > implemented ? I do not know of IBM. Oracle has a system similar to pgcrypto but more sophisticated. I do not know if it can use encrypted indexes, encrypted dates and encrypted times (it is likely but I did not tried, yet). It stores its "global encryption password" into a system table in encrypted form. Only authenticated users can decrypt data. Something like that can be done with PostgreSQL, as well. The problem is that I have to store somewhere a password in clear text (either the password used to encrypt/decrypt data or the password used to decrypt this password). Oracle has a built-in feature for encrypting/decrypting this password's password. > For strict comformance, you really should consult a local legal > professional for their opinion, and be prepared to pay for that protection. We are doing it. Unfortunately, our lawyer still have to discuss technical problems with a technician (that is: me). BTW: It looks like I'm the only one here facing this problem. That's surprising, given the number of countries that have a law like the italian one and the wide diffusion of PostgreSQL. See you. ----------------------------------------- Alessandro Bottoni and Silvana Di Martino alessandrobottoni@interfree.it silvanadimartino@tin.it
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: