Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200403042242.06225.lowen@pari.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right
Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 04 March 2004 10:28 pm, Tom Lane wrote: > There were no code-change differences in this rewrap, so I see no real > need to change the version number. > The lesson I'd prefer to see us take away from this is that Marc needs > to automate his release wrapping process more. These sorta mistakes > shouldn't have happened in the first place ... There are now multiple copies of 7.3.6 out there. How is a body to know which one to use? On RPMs, as you well now, SOP is to increment the release on any change, including a typo. This way there is no ambiguity. This is not the first time tarballs have been streamlined. I'm glad I hadn't built any RPMs yet. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: