Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... ); |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200403040340.i243eoj19409@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... ); (Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Comments on patch for date_trunc( 'week', ... );
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Well, it must have hit the lists if I have put it in the patch queue, no? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey Bruce, I never saw the patch hit the hackers list. Did any of you smart folks take a look at it? Cheers, Rob When grilled further on (Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:58:02 -0500 (EST)), Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> confessed: > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches > > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Robert Creager wrote: > -- Start of PGP signed section. > > > > Per a brief conversation with Tom, I've created a patch for adding support > > for'week' within the date_trunc function. > > > > Within the patch I added a couple of test cases and associated target > > output, and changed the documentation to add 'week' appropriately. > > > > Comments? Should I of bypassed this list and subscribed/posted to the patch > > list? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: