Re: Pl/Java - next step?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pl/Java - next step? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040302062132.GE496@dcc.uchile.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pl/Java - next step? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:14:09PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Thomas Hallgren wrote: > > 1. Select Pl/Java_JNI. > > 2. Select Pl/Java_remote > > 3. Choose both and agree on the SQL + Java semantics > > 4. Make the postmaster spawn threads rather than processes > > (controversial? Nah :-) ) > > Option 5 (or 0) would be to use GCJ. This is likely to be the fastest > and most lightweight solution, but perhaps not the most featureful. Hm, last time I tried this it just SIGSEGV'd the backend after loading libgcj.so or something like that. I didn't peek further because I feel strange in Java land. -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) La web junta la gente porque no importa que clase de mutante sexual seas, tienes millones de posibles parejas. Pon "buscar gente que tengan sexo con ciervos incendiánse", y el computador dirá "especifique el tipo de ciervo" (Jason Alexander)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: