Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons
От | Tim Larson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040229032244.GE24612@keow.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ADMIN] Schema comparisons ("Alex J. Avriette" <alex@posixnap.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 09:23:48PM -0500, Alex J. Avriette wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 10:39:40AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > >> Have you tried diffing pg_dump output? It's not the greatest tool but > > >> it's helpful. > > > > > Yes, I did. It was quite cumbersome. Especially since the OIDs and > > > TOC entry numbers didn't matchup; and, since those didn't always match, > > > the order of objects wasn't quite the same either. So, diff was > > > throwing a lot of false positives at me. > > > > Yeah. CVS-tip pg_dump doesn't show OIDs by default, to make it easier > > to use for purposes like this. The ordering issue is the bigger problem > > though. I presume that the object creation history is different in the > > two databases and so pg_dump's habit of sorting by OID isn't helpful. > > I recently had to figure out what was different between the "live" schema > and the schema in cvs at work. This was a really painful process, and it > occurred to me that it wouldn't be terribly hard to write a perl program > to do it (I wound up using vim and diff). Is there interest in such a tool? > I could probably have one written within a day or two. I sometimes supplement vim/diff with xxdiff, meld, and winmerge. Hope this helps someone, --Tim Larson
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: