Re: cacheable stored functions?
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: cacheable stored functions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200402201601.28789.dev@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | cacheable stored functions? (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: cacheable stored functions?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Friday 20 February 2004 15:35, Bill Moran wrote: > I'm converting a SQL application to PostgreSQL. The majority of the logic > in this application is in the stored functions in the database. > > Somewhere, I saw a reference to "WITH (iscachable)" for stored functions, > looking again, I'm unable to find any reference to this directive. I have > a single function that is _obviously_ safe to cache using this, and it > generates no errors or problems that I can see. > > Now I'm looking at a lot of other functions that, if cached, would speed > up performance considerably. Yet I'm reluctant to use this directive > since I can't find documentation on it anywhere. From memory, "iscachable" was replaced in version 7.3 by the three finer-grained settings IMMUTABLE, STABLE, VOLATILE. I'm guessing the old behaviour is still there for backwards compatibility, but it's probably best to use the new versions. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: