Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200402201232.54943.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement ("Lane Beneke" <lane.b@smcinc.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Lane, > So, here's my thought. How difficult would it be to build a server daemon > that used PostgreSQL on the backend, and presented it to the network as a > SQL Server compatible DB? I think you're on the wrong list for this question. I take it you're talking a compatibitily layer, like Rosetta? I would think that writing a program to broker requests on port 1433 and re-interpret SQL Server specific syntax would be a managable project for a good C or Perl hacker. What would be difficult-to-impossible is: 1) making it scale & perform well (in my experience, MS SQL Server accessed through Rosetta loses about 40% performance and is very limited in scalability). 2) Making it integrate well with MS networking and the MS ODBC/OLEDB/ADO/.NET clients. Also, if you have T-SQL procedures, you would have to somehow implement T-SQL for Postgres; translating the procedures is really not an option. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: