Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...

Larry Rosenman wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> 
> 
> --On Wednesday, February 18, 2004 13:56:14 -0500 Bruce Momjian 
> <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > The question is whether we should have a GUC variable to control no
> > waiting on locks or add NO WAIT to specific SQL commands.
> >
> > Does anyone want to vote _against_ the GUC idea for nowait locking.  (We
> > already have two voting for such a variable.)
> >
> > If there is no one except Tom, we can continue.
> I'm with Tom.  Playing with *ALL* locks is just asking for TROUBLE.

OK, seems folks want the NO WAIT to apply only to the requested lock,
and want syntax to show that.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073