Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200402091955.i19JtSf15317@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium (James Moe <jimoe@sohnen-moe.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
James Moe wrote: > John Gibson wrote: > > > > Assuming similar memory and disk sub-systems, I am considering a Quad > > Xeon system vs. a Dual Itanium for PostgreSQL. I believe that the > > PostgreSQL code is written for 32 bit and not optimized for the 64 bit > > Itanium cpu. That makes me think that the Xeon system would be a better > > choice. > > > The Itanic hasn't lived up to its marketing hype. The comparisons > I've seen between it and a 32-bit CPU show performance differences > primarily due to clock speeds. So far the only advantage of 64 bits is > address space. And because they are new, itanics cost much more. > So with 2 itanics you get a slight improvement. With 4 xeons you get > about 1.7x improvement over your current setup. Here is an interesting article about the Opteron/Itanium issue: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=14038 -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: