Jan Wieck wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > wieck@svr1.postgresql.org (Jan Wieck) writes:
> >> Added GUC variable bgwriter_flush_method controlling the action
> >> done by the background writer between writing dirty blocks and
> >> napping.
> >
> >> none (default) no action
> >> sync bgwriter calls smgrsync() causing a sync(2)
> >
> > Why would that be useful at all? I thought the purpose of the bgwriter
> > was to avoid I/O storms, not provoke them.
>
> Calling sync(2) every time the background writer naps means calling it
> every couple hundred milliseconds. That can hardly be called an IO
> storm, it's more like a constant breeze.
I talked to Jan about the idea of sync on every background writer sleep.
He is going to study the issue and report back.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073