Re: Disaster!
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Disaster! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200401261804.i0QI4CY10530@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Disaster! (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Disaster!
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > I said: > > If there wasn't disk space enough to hold the clog page, the checkpoint > > attempt should have failed. So it may be that allowing a short read in > > slru.c would be patching the symptom of a bug that is really elsewhere. > > After more staring at the code, I have a theory. SlruPhysicalWritePage > and SlruPhysicalReadPage are coded on the assumption that close() can > never return any interesting failure. However, it now occurs to me that > there are some filesystem implementations wherein ENOSPC could be > returned at close() rather than the preceding write(). (For instance, > the HPUX man page for close() states that this never happens on local > filesystems but can happen on NFS.) So it'd be possible for > SlruPhysicalWritePage to think it had successfully written a page when > it hadn't. This would allow a checkpoint to complete :-( > > Chris, what's your platform exactly, and what kind of filesystem are > you storing pg_clog on? We already have a TODO on fclose(): * Add checks for fclose() failure -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: