Re: FAQ (disk space)
От | Einar Indridason |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FAQ (disk space) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040126104855.GB31868@f-prot.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FAQ (disk space) (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: FAQ (disk space)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 09:29:12PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Clarence Gardner wrote: > > >> Could you please tell me if there's a limit in the amount of records that > > >> the database can handle? > > > > >See the FAQ: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html#4.5 > > > > Speaking of the FAQ, in the next question (#4.6), should > > "NULLs are stored in bitmaps" say "NULL indicators are stored in bitmaps"? > > I changed it to: > > NULLs are stored _as_ bitmaps Eh... good morning folks. I have been lurking on the postgreSQL lists for a while. Now when I read this, a question arise. Does postgres calculate some sort of a "checksum" over a row? I mean... storing whether a field is NULL or not inside a single bit, seems slightly risky (especially when we consider how much of the hardware out there, is of marginal quality). Would it be worth it to calculate some sort of a checksum over a row, and store that checksum along with the row? Cheers, -- Einar Indridason einari@f-prot.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: