Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200401230455.i0N4tWJ01496@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LWLock/ShmemIndex startup question (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com> writes: > > Tom Lane writes: > >> I'm not sure there's any need for > >> src/backend/port/win32/sema.c at all. > > > (Do you have any idea on the historical > > context of this code? I wondered as to, if we have no win32 port, why there > > would be a seemingly good-to-go sema replacement?) > > [cvs is your friend...] It appears to have been added as part of the > MinGW porting work last May. I don't have much faith in it; as far as > I heard the MinGW port never got further than making the client-side > code work, and so this file has no real-world testing. Right, that is from PeerDirect's Win32 port, with a little cleanup. It should work fine, or we can wack it around. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: