Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql)
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040121223112.GA8058@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql) ("Rick Gigger" <rick@alpinenetworking.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql)
Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 11:23:40AM -0700, Rick Gigger wrote: > > Yes but sometimes an enterprise level application may need to be put on a > laptop and taken off-line. Having an embedded database that is compatible > with the one on the server makes this a bit easier to do. Why can't you just run a postgres instance for this? What is magic about "embedded" for this sort of application? Sounds like a clever wrapper script is all that's necessary for something like that, no? A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca My friend, you can put wheels on your mama but that doesn't make her a bus. --Joel Spolsky
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: