Re: Any real known bugs about wrong selects?
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any real known bugs about wrong selects? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200401131554.42850.dev@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Any real known bugs about wrong selects? (Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 15:08, Jeff Eckermann wrote: > > I have been reading the PostgreSQL mailing lists for > several years now, and have seen many bug reports. > Few of these turn out to be actual bugs, usually they > are due to error or misunderstanding by the user, or > else hardware failures. In those few cases where the > bugs are genuine, there is usually a patch released > within hours of the report. Try and match that > anywhere else. And if you want read them too, the archive is publicly available at the following URL: http://www.postgresql.org/lists.html You can see into our kitchens before sitting down to your meal... Oh - another place to get a feel for what sort of bugs get found/fixed in a live release, have a look in the online docs at the release notes. The only bug that's bitten me was one where a backup/restore didn't set the search_path correctly. It meant I had to intervene in a restore - inconvenient, nothing more. I think the most serious bug of recent times is probably the one fixed in 7.3.4 - search for server startup/WAL. As I recall, if some boundary condition was met the server would refuse to start. I don't believe it caused any damage to data. PS - Jeff's right about the response time. For actual bugs, it's often breathtakingly fast to get a patch. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: