Re: Any real known bugs about wrong selects?
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any real known bugs about wrong selects? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040113084018.R85596@megazone.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Any real known bugs about wrong selects? (David Teran <david.teran@cluster9.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, David Teran wrote: > I wonder if people encountered bugs like 'a select returns a wrong > number of rows' or any other very serious bugs. We do not have problems It's happened on rare occasion in the past in my recollection for things that are basically bugs. It generally gets resolved quickly and usually someone can suggest workaround SQL while waiting. Nominally speaking, some of the case folding issues with identifiers might be considered to be such a problem: Select * from FOO, "foo" meaning something different when two tables were created as "FOO" and "foo" from what the spec would want. This is currently considered a don't do it sort of situation. Umm, there are some things that aren't really done yet, for example IIRC upper()/lower() really only work on single byte encodings. There are probably other things of this sort that one might need to watch out for.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: