Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200401100457.i0A4veZ06082@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary ("Chris Travers" <chris@travelamericas.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Chris Travers wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> > > Yes I did see that. Actually from what I know of the GPL, this could very > > well be the case. > > > The GPL specifically allows non-Free/Open Source components to talk to GPL'd > applications via pipes and sockets. I am assuming here that network sockets > are included, so there is NO copyright reason that, were the protocol > reverse engineered that a third-party mysql driver couldn't be written. Of > course, you could NOT use the MySQL source to do it. But the MySQL description says: http://www.mysql.com/products/opensource-license.html Under the Open Source License, you must release the complete source code for the application that is built on MySQL. What does that mean, "built on MySQL". I think that means "depends" on MySQL. At least I have heard that description: http://www.edwardbear.org/serendipity/archives/1193_My_Beef_with_MySQLs_License.html -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: