failures on machines using jfs
От | Andrew Sullivan |
---|---|
Тема | failures on machines using jfs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040107230608.GN12531@libertyrms.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: failures on machines using jfs
Re: failures on machines using jfs |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi all, Chris Browne (one of my colleagues here) has posted some tests in the past indicating that jfs may be the fastest filesystem for Postgres use on Linux. We have lately had a couple of cases where machines either locked up, slowed down to the point of complete unusability, or died completely while using jfs. We are _not_ sure that jfs is in fact the culprit. In one case, a kernel panic appeared to be referring to the jfs kernel module, but I can't be sure as I lost the output immediately thereafter. Yesterday, we had a problem of data corruption on a failed jfs volume. None of this is to say that jfs is in fact to blame, nor even that, if it is, it does not have something to do with the age of our installations, &c. (these are all RH 8). In fact, I suspect hardware in both cases. But I thought I'd mention it just in case other people are seeing strange behaviour, on the principle of "better safe than sorry." A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada <andrew@libertyrms.info> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x110
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: