Re: Mnogosearch (Was: Re: website doc search is ... )
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mnogosearch (Was: Re: website doc search is ... ) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20040101234841.W913@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Mnogosearch (Was: Re: website doc search is ... ) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Mnogosearch (Was: Re: website doc search is ... )
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > > I'm still loading the 'WITHOUT OIDS' database ... should I expect that, > > with CLUSTERing, its performance would be slightly better yet, or would > > the difference be negligible? > > I think the difference will be marginal, but worth doing; you're > reducing the row size from 40 bytes to 36 if I counted correctly, > so circa-10% I/O saving, no? > > 24 bytes minimum 7.4 HeapTupleHeader > 4 bytes OID > 12 bytes three int4 fields > > On a machine with 8-byte MAXALIGN, this would not help, but on > Intel hardware it should. I take it there is no way of drop'ng OIDs after the fact, eh? :) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: