Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Tag: REL7_4_STABLE
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Tag: REL7_4_STABLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200312221811.hBMIBDi01746@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Tag: REL7_4_STABLE ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Tag: REL7_4_STABLE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > The only problem with removing HISTORY from CVS is that we will not have > > an easily reable list of release changes _until_ we package the release. > > Perhaps we should keep HISTORY in CVS, but regenerate it on tarball > > packaging, and INSTALL too. > > Confused here, but how "up to date" is HISTORY in CVS to start with? I > don't go out of my way to watch for them, but commits to HISTORY don't > seem to be all that often to start with ... and how many ppl actually look > at the HISTORY file *except* at release time? Usually I modify HISTORY during beta, then move it to release.sgml, but I could reverse that and do edits in release.sgml then regenerate and copy HISTORY. It is mostly during beta. We could throw a URL into the HISTORY file telling people where to look for the generated release notes. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: