Re: My SGML build fixed

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Right now it just seems like a waste of resources and it confuses
> > the onlookers.
>
> If Bruce is willing to expend the resources, what's the problem?
> I kinda like having some redundancy in this service, myself.

Bruce said he does it because postgresql.org is regularly broken.  To
that I say, fix it.  If he says he does it out of joy, then I don't
care.

However, maybe we should structure the developer website listing
differently, such as

Development version of the documentation
* Mirror 0
* Mirror 1

so onlookers see that they are two more or less identical versions of
the same service.