Re: Limiting per user and per db accesse (was TODO list)
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Limiting per user and per db accesse (was TODO list) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20031218014939.GD27884@dcc.uchile.cl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Limiting per user and per db accesse (was TODO list) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Limiting per user and per db accesse (was TODO list)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:30:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Jonathan Gardner <jgardner@jonathangardner.net> writes: > > - -- Group www can only have 12 concurrent connections with the cluster. > > ALTER GROUP www SET max_connections = 12; > > I think group-related restrictions would be an impossible rat's nest > to define, because there's no one-to-one correspondence between backend > processes and groups. Per-user and per-database make sense to me, > because a backend does have a well-defined (session) user and a > well-defined database. What about roles? Is anybody going to attack the mixed users+groups implementation in this development cycles? -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>) A male gynecologist is like an auto mechanic who never owned a car. (Carrie Snow)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: